Login or Register :: Home :: Search :: Your Account :: Forums :: Waraxe Advisories :: Tools :: July 27, 2024 Menu Home Logout Discussions Forums Members List IRC chat Tools Base64 coder MD5 hash CRC32 checksum ROT13 coder SHA-1 hash URL-decoder Sql Char Encoder Affiliates y3dips ITsec Md5 Cracker User Manuals AlbumNow Content Content Sections FAQ Top Info Feedback Recommend Us Search Journal Your Account User Info Welcome, Anonymous Nickname Password (Register) Membership: Latest: MichaelSnaRe New Today: 0 New Yesterday: 0 Overall: 9144 People Online: Visitors: 207 Members: 0 Total: 207 Full disclosure CyberDanube Security Research 20240722-0 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in Perten/PerkinElmer ProcessPlus [KIS-2024-06] XenForo <= 2.2.15 (Template System) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [KIS-2024-05] XenForo <= 2.2.15 (Widget::actionSave) Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability CVE-2024-33326 CVE-2024-33327 CVE-2024-33328 CVE-2024-33329 CyberDanube Security Research 20240703-0 | Authenticated Command Injection in Helmholz Industrial Router REX100 SEC Consult SA-20240627-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI installer in SoftMaker Office / FreeOffice SEC Consult SA-20240626-0 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Siemens Power Automation Products Novel DoS Vulnerability Affecting WebRTC Media Servers APPLE-SA-06-25-2024-1 AirPods Firmware Update 6A326, AirPods Firmware Update 6F8, and Beats Firmware Update 6F8 40 vulnerabilities in Toshiba Multi-Function Printers 17 vulnerabilities in Sharp Multi-Function Printers SEC Consult SA-20240624-0 :: Multiple Vulnerabilities allowing complete bypass in Faronics WINSelect (Standard + Enterprise) IT Security and Insecurity Portal www.waraxe.us Forum Index -> All other hashes -> LM and NTLM Hash decryption Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4 ... 76, 77, 78Next View previous topic :: View next topic Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:11 am mic33 Regular user Joined: Mar 09, 2009 Posts: 11 waraxe wrote: mic33 wrote: Thanks for your help and your time! language is Italian.... I think there aren't "weird" characters (like ÖÄÜÕöäüõ), but there are special characters i.e: $, &, £, etc Can you help me please? You are my last hope!!!!! I appreciate very much!!!! Thanks you!!! I tried and with no luck ... Only option seems to be LM bruteforce with extended charset, which includes ascii > 127. Thanks! I'm a beginner, but I want ask you a question: Yesterday I read on internet LM hash contains until 14 characters, but I'm sure my password is longer, I think it contains 16 characters... so I ask you... maybe your attack with rainbow tables might be against NT hash? I think there aren't "weird" characters... Excuse me for the question.... Thanks for help!!! Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:32 am waraxe Site admin Joined: May 11, 2004 Posts: 2407 Location: Estonia, Tartu In case of len(pass)>14 LM hash will be empty (AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE), but in your case it is not. Now, if password really is 16 chars long, then chances are slim, that you are able to crack such NT hash. Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:08 am mic33 Regular user Joined: Mar 09, 2009 Posts: 11 waraxe wrote: In case of len(pass)>14 LM hash will be empty (AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE), but in your case it is not. Now, if password really is 16 chars long, then chances are slim, that you are able to crack such NT hash. Oh... sorry I'm wrong.... Excuse me... I thought lenght pass > 14... But if you need to decode only LM hash, why is there also NT hash? Can you help me with LM bruteforce with extended charset, which includes ascii > 127? Thanks! I appreciate very much! Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:45 pm waraxe Site admin Joined: May 11, 2004 Posts: 2407 Location: Estonia, Tartu mic33 wrote: waraxe wrote: In case of len(pass)>14 LM hash will be empty (AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE), but in your case it is not. Now, if password really is 16 chars long, then chances are slim, that you are able to crack such NT hash. Oh... sorry I'm wrong.... Excuse me... I thought lenght pass > 14... But if you need to decode only LM hash, why is there also NT hash? Can you help me with LM bruteforce with extended charset, which includes ascii > 127? Thanks! I appreciate very much! Why are LM and NT hashes both needed ... LM is for backward compatibility and Win2000 and WinXP usually store both LM and NT hashes for same password. Exceptions: 1. if password len is > 14 chars, then only NT hash is used 2. in Vista LM support is disabled by default LM hash is case insensitive, so if you got password ADMIN, then in reality it can be admin, AdMin, admIN, etc LM hash is based on two separate 7-char long password parts, so LM cracking is much more easier compared to NT hash. About cracking with extended charset ... For example Cain can crack LM hashes and does support custom charset, so probably it's able to do the work. But expect very poor performance for such cracking, because it's directly related to charset size. Maybe EGB NT hash bruteforce is able to do same work, but I'd prefer LM cracking, because you have better chances for success with it. Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:08 am mic33 Regular user Joined: Mar 09, 2009 Posts: 11 waraxe wrote: mic33 wrote: waraxe wrote: In case of len(pass)>14 LM hash will be empty (AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE), but in your case it is not. Now, if password really is 16 chars long, then chances are slim, that you are able to crack such NT hash. Oh... sorry I'm wrong.... Excuse me... I thought lenght pass > 14... But if you need to decode only LM hash, why is there also NT hash? Can you help me with LM bruteforce with extended charset, which includes ascii > 127? Thanks! I appreciate very much! Why are LM and NT hashes both needed ... LM is for backward compatibility and Win2000 and WinXP usually store both LM and NT hashes for same password. Exceptions: 1. if password len is > 14 chars, then only NT hash is used 2. in Vista LM support is disabled by default LM hash is case insensitive, so if you got password ADMIN, then in reality it can be admin, AdMin, admIN, etc LM hash is based on two separate 7-char long password parts, so LM cracking is much more easier compared to NT hash. About cracking with extended charset ... For example Cain can crack LM hashes and does support custom charset, so probably it's able to do the work. But expect very poor performance for such cracking, because it's directly related to charset size. Maybe EGB NT hash bruteforce is able to do same work, but I'd prefer LM cracking, because you have better chances for success with it. Ok! Thanks for explaination.... Please, can you help me with this difficult crack? thanks in advance!!!! Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:57 am darcsacka Beginner Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 4 ok i have these 2 nt hashes: 59f4f2bb98b1d46e5b1cc69e53dd0d98 59f4f2bb98b1d46e5b1cc69e53ddod98 i need the passes.....from there any1 with an ideea?..... hashes created with ophcrack from a vista buisniss thank u in advance Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:41 pm pierpox Regular user Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 7 Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:58 pm darcsacka Beginner Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 4 yes nt hash is nt hash and md5 is md5....2 different things...2 different algorythms Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:03 pm waraxe Site admin Joined: May 11, 2004 Posts: 2407 Location: Estonia, Tartu pierpox wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? NT hash is basically md4 hash of Unicode password: http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html Code: Password: SecREt01 The Unicode mixed-case password is "0x53006500630052004500740030003100" in hexadecimal; the MD4 hash of this value is calculated, giving "0xcd06ca7c7e10c99b1d33b7485a2ed808". This is the NTLM hash. So if you have simple password, consisting of lower-ascii characters, then just put binary zero after every char and then take md4 hash Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:28 pm pierpox Regular user Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 7 waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? NT hash is basically md4 hash of Unicode password: http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html Code: Password: SecREt01 The Unicode mixed-case password is "0x53006500630052004500740030003100" in hexadecimal; the MD4 hash of this value is calculated, giving "0xcd06ca7c7e10c99b1d33b7485a2ed808". This is the NTLM hash. So if you have simple password, consisting of lower-ascii characters, then just put binary zero after every char and then take md4 hash thanks for the reply...but using this site http://tools.web-max.ca/encode_decode.php for calculating the md4 hash value of "53006500630052004500740030003100" the result is :"534fa82d2e2feb9904f143b40050b7d3",I don't understand,what is the right value? Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:22 pm darcsacka Beginner Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 4 well i have the sam and system file. any other methods then bruteforce known for cracking the pass? Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:31 pm waraxe Site admin Joined: May 11, 2004 Posts: 2407 Location: Estonia, Tartu pierpox wrote: waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? NT hash is basically md4 hash of Unicode password: http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html Code: Password: SecREt01 The Unicode mixed-case password is "0x53006500630052004500740030003100" in hexadecimal; the MD4 hash of this value is calculated, giving "0xcd06ca7c7e10c99b1d33b7485a2ed808". This is the NTLM hash. So if you have simple password, consisting of lower-ascii characters, then just put binary zero after every char and then take md4 hash thanks for the reply...but using this site http://tools.web-max.ca/encode_decode.php for calculating the md4 hash value of "53006500630052004500740030003100" the result is :"534fa82d2e2feb9904f143b40050b7d3",I don't understand,what is the right value? I meant binary zero (0x00, \x00, NUL, %00), not literal zero (0x30, "0",%30). Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:05 am pierpox Regular user Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 7 waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? NT hash is basically md4 hash of Unicode password: http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html Code: Password: SecREt01 The Unicode mixed-case password is "0x53006500630052004500740030003100" in hexadecimal; the MD4 hash of this value is calculated, giving "0xcd06ca7c7e10c99b1d33b7485a2ed808". This is the NTLM hash. So if you have simple password, consisting of lower-ascii characters, then just put binary zero after every char and then take md4 hash thanks for the reply...but using this site http://tools.web-max.ca/encode_decode.php for calculating the md4 hash value of "53006500630052004500740030003100" the result is :"534fa82d2e2feb9904f143b40050b7d3",I don't understand,what is the right value? I meant binary zero (0x00, \x00, NUL, %00), not literal zero (0x30, "0",%30). Hi,I'm sorry if I abuse of your patience, but can you write the right string on which I have to apply the md4 encoder?Many thanks Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:19 am mic33 Regular user Joined: Mar 09, 2009 Posts: 11 mic33 wrote: waraxe wrote: mic33 wrote: waraxe wrote: In case of len(pass)>14 LM hash will be empty (AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE), but in your case it is not. Now, if password really is 16 chars long, then chances are slim, that you are able to crack such NT hash. Oh... sorry I'm wrong.... Excuse me... I thought lenght pass > 14... But if you need to decode only LM hash, why is there also NT hash? Can you help me with LM bruteforce with extended charset, which includes ascii > 127? Thanks! I appreciate very much! Why are LM and NT hashes both needed ... LM is for backward compatibility and Win2000 and WinXP usually store both LM and NT hashes for same password. Exceptions: 1. if password len is > 14 chars, then only NT hash is used 2. in Vista LM support is disabled by default LM hash is case insensitive, so if you got password ADMIN, then in reality it can be admin, AdMin, admIN, etc LM hash is based on two separate 7-char long password parts, so LM cracking is much more easier compared to NT hash. About cracking with extended charset ... For example Cain can crack LM hashes and does support custom charset, so probably it's able to do the work. But expect very poor performance for such cracking, because it's directly related to charset size. Maybe EGB NT hash bruteforce is able to do same work, but I'd prefer LM cracking, because you have better chances for success with it. Ok! Thanks for explaination.... Please, can you help me with this difficult crack? thanks in advance!!!! Excuse me.... do you need time to decode this difficult hash? Is it possible? Can you help me, please? I wait you... you are fantastic! Thanks very much!!!! thanks very much Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:13 am waraxe Site admin Joined: May 11, 2004 Posts: 2407 Location: Estonia, Tartu pierpox wrote: waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: waraxe wrote: pierpox wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to ask an information.I tried to extract from my laptop with windows vista the SAM and SYSTEM files and I have loaded them with ophcrack.On the row with my user name there is just an NT HASH code , all other fields are empty.The strange thing is: calculating the hash code of my vista login password with the MD4 or MD5 algorithm , none of these values matches that of NT HASH.So my question is: what type of information does NT HASH collect about my login password? I thought that NT HASH was the hash code of the password calculated with the MD5 or MD4 algorithm ...can someone give me some advice? NT hash is basically md4 hash of Unicode password: http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html Code: Password: SecREt01 The Unicode mixed-case password is "0x53006500630052004500740030003100" in hexadecimal; the MD4 hash of this value is calculated, giving "0xcd06ca7c7e10c99b1d33b7485a2ed808". This is the NTLM hash. So if you have simple password, consisting of lower-ascii characters, then just put binary zero after every char and then take md4 hash thanks for the reply...but using this site http://tools.web-max.ca/encode_decode.php for calculating the md4 hash value of "53006500630052004500740030003100" the result is :"534fa82d2e2feb9904f143b40050b7d3",I don't understand,what is the right value? I meant binary zero (0x00, \x00, NUL, %00), not literal zero (0x30, "0",%30). Hi,I'm sorry if I abuse of your patience, but can you write the right string on which I have to apply the md4 encoder?Many thanks Most online tools do not work properly with strings containing binary zeros, so you need local test. For example this is NT hash calculation using Linux shell: Code: $ echo -n test | sed -r 's,(.),\1\x00,g' | openssl md4 LM and NTLM Hash decryption www.waraxe.us Forum Index -> All other hashes You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum All times are GMT Page 3 of 78 Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4 ... 76, 77, 78Next All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 YearOldest FirstNewest First Select a forumSecurity Research by waraxe----------------General discussionHow to fixMetasploit relatedHash cracking requests----------------MD5 hashesAll other hashesHash related informationhttp://www.waraxe.us portal----------------SuggestionsCooperation proposalsSecurity bugs and issues in general----------------Newbies cornerSql injectionCross-site scripting aka XSSRemote file inclusionFull path disclosureShell commands injectionPhishing and Social EngineeringAll other security holesVarious software----------------PhpNukePostNukePhpBBXMB forumvBulletin BoardInvision Power Boarde107MamboJoomlaXOOPSM$ WindowsLinux worldAll other softwareCoppermine Photo GalleryProgramming languages----------------PhpMySqlPerlJavaJavascriptC and C++Visual BasicBorland Delphi and PascalPythonHTML and XMLAssemblerReverse engineering----------------Newbies cornerDisassemblingPHP script decode requestsMiscellaneous stuff----------------Future of the ITNanotechnologyFun cornerLinksTry2hack sitesProxy databaseDirect Downloads----------------ToolsTutorialsWordlistsRecycle Bin----------------Removed messagesOutdated posts Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group

Space Raider game for Android, free download - Space Raider gameplay video - Zone Raider mobile games
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments and posts are property of their posters, all the rest (c) 2004-2024 Janek Vind "waraxe"
Page Generation: 0.186 Seconds